Arendt found Eichmann an ordinary, rather bland, bureaucrat, who in her words, was âneither perverted nor sadisticâ, but âterrifyingly normalâ. He acted without any motive other than to diligently advance his career in the Nazi bureaucracy. Eichmann was not an amoral monster, she concluded in her study of the case, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (1963). Instead, he performed evil deeds without evil intentions, a fact connected to his âthoughtlessnessâ, a disengagement from the reality of his evil acts. Eichmann ânever realised what he was doingâ due to an âinability⌠to think from the standpoint of somebody elseâ. Lacking this particular cognitive ability, he âcommit[ted] crimes under circumstances that made it well-nigh impossible for him to know or to feel that he [was] doing wrongâ.Â
Arendt dubbed these collective characteristics of Eichmann âthe banality of evilâ: he was not inherently evil, but merely shallow and clueless, a âjoinerâ, in the words of one contemporary interpreter of Arendtâs thesis: he was a man who drifted into the Nazi Party, in search of purpose and direction, not out of deep ideological belief. In Arendtâs telling, Eichmann reminds us of the protagonist in Albert Camusâs novel The Stranger (1942), who randomly and casually kills a man, but then afterwards feels no remorse. There was no particular intention or obvious evil motive: the deed just âhappenedâ.
Joey Kato
 @mixcloudjkato36
What Did Hannah Arendt Really Mean by the Banality of Evil? – Aeon – Pocket
get-pocket.com
Nadler delivered an extended statement attacking the president and calling on the Senate to subpoena testimony from former national security adviser John Bolton. Cipollone responded by saying the New York congressman âshould be ashamed ⌠for the way you addressed this body.â
âItâs about time we bring this power trip in for a landing,â Cipollone said, prompting Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) to chuckle. âItâs a farce ⌠Mr. Nadler, you owe an apology to the president of the United States and his family, you owe an apology to the Senate, but most of all, you owe an apology to the American people.â
Sekulow followed Cipollone and went a step further in his words and tone.
âThe Senate is not on trial,â he almost shouted.
During these remarks, Nadler did not meet Sekulowâs gaze. As the White House counsel concluded, he returned to his table and threw down his papers in disgust.
The tensions rose further as Nadler responded, calling Cipollone a liar in one case. Cipollone shook his head, along with several Republican senators.
Phrase of the Day:
The Banality of Evil
Nadler: Â You oughta be ashamed of your deception and cover-up of the Prezâs wrongdoings.
Republican Ass-Hat: Â You’re not the boss of me. Â Who died and made you king?
CJ John Bob: Â Forty lashes with a wet noodle. Â Letâs remember where we are and play nicely with each other. Â We donât ever talk like that here.
This is just ludicrous. Â Craig, Thereâs a book or a sitcom a la âCarter Countryâ somewhere in yesterdayâs mess.
SFB calls climate changers pessimists (or tries to say it), and Greta directly responds to him when she gives her speech âDonât be pessimists, they say.â SFB just couldnât let Greta have the last word at Davos.  Another presser before takeoff.  Jeez.  Also, did you hear him attempt to pronounce the word pessimist?  What is wrong with him?  Medically, I mean.  Â
darn I conked out around 11pm, missed the fireworks
Randy Rainbow is at it again with “Gaston” from Beauty and the Beast
Sounds like Nadler is being his usual idiotic self. Screwed the day up, everything had been going so good.
Jack
I watched some of it… Â but I’m not a late nighter. Â
Won’t watch much today. Â Going to the art museum in Manchester. Â There’s a special exhibit of shaker furniture and they have a couple of Edward Hopper paintings on loan. Â They leave on Sunday. Â Â
Still letting my eyes recover from the very late night. Â
OK, I don’t think Bolton will be the hero of the impeachment trial. He’s got competing interests – whatever future he’d have as a repug power player versus a desire to sell his book. That said, here’s what SFB had to say about Bolton testifying:
At a news conference in Switzerland on Wednesday morning, Trump said that he would like for Bolton to testify but raised several concerns, including that Bolton left the administration on bad terms.
âYou donât like people testifying when they didnât leave on good terms,â Trump said, after arguing that there were also national security reasons to keep Bolton from testifying.
Yeah, right, he’d like Bolton to testify. Just like he’d like to testify himself. Ain’t gonna happen.
Jack, perhaps Nadler went over the top but he didn’t say anything I don’t agree with.Â
âSo, weâre doing very well. I got to watch [the impeachment trial] enough. I thought our team did a very good job. But honestly, we have all the material. They donât have the material.â
“we have all the material. They donât have the material”Â
hmmm, isn’t this what article 2 of impeachment is about?
from rollingstone article about IMpotus brag above:
Usually, the Trump administration either refuses to explain their stonewalling or excuses their lack of cooperation away by bashing the investigation, calling it illegitimate or a witch hunt. But here, rather astonishingly, Trump seems to be flatly admitting to withholding evidence.
Hey- Nadler got admonished for quoting my 5pm-ish post from yesterday.
Hi, Mr. Nadler! Â
Thank you for calling out the GOP Senators who voted literally 582 times to keep all of us in the dark.
582 times!
The Senate may acquit, but Schiff is holding this trial in the Court of Public Opinion, and is crushing the Republicans.
Thank you, Rep. Schiff!
Schiff is doing a wonderful job right now.
Ping! I missed you the other day. Hope you’re enjoying today’s presentation. Seems as if Cong. Schiff is having ‘fair winds and following seas’.
Not nonfeasance nor misfeasance, but malfeasance! Go for Goiter-Man, too!!
Ooh, nice, Schiff used your Franklin quote as his conclusion, CC, nice job.
Watched all of Schiff’s epic 2 1/2 hour tour de force. Stunning. Even if it doesn’t matter to lock step cover-up Republicans.Â
Can someone plz let me know when Republicans finish with their opening obfuscation? Â i need a break and thatâs the best time for one.
Bink – I think you’ll get your break Monday. 582 times? Got a cite for that? I’d love to pass it along.
Bink, GOP thugs don’t get to speak for 3 days, except on FOX.Â
Ah, ok, thanks CC.
Â
Pogo-
11 amendments, 53 Rethuglican Senators voted to table them all 11 times, except Susan Collins on the least controversial 10th amendment (regarding scheduling), ergo:
Â
10 x 53 = 530
530 (plus) 52 = 582
You can cite me.
i donât love misnomers, but i may pepper my comments with âRethuglicanâ. Â Thanks again, CC!
Anyone catch what that person was yelling about?
Dems could have rested their case after Schiff’s powerful presentation. Lost the narrative with later speakers, disjointed and confusing.
Bink. Sounded like “Schumer is the devil.”Â
plus something about “Jesus Christ”
lol, ty Sir
I fear law of diminishing returns if Dems keep repeating themselves.Â
i liked Hakim Jeffriesâ presentation.., thereâs always Netflix if people get bored.
Bloombergâs new ad tonight: Â If Senate Republicans wonât remove Trump from office, this November, we will. Â
Best thing Dems can do now is pile on the videos and tweets showing Trump incriminating himself.Â
Lindsey Graham flat out said theyâll do whatever they need âto protect Trump.â What about  protecting our democracy, Lindsey?  Â
…funny how blatantly lying to the American people from the âWorldâs Most Distinguished Deliberative Bodyâ is acceptable to Chief Justice Roberts, but calling the liars out from it isnât acceptable. Â Makes zero sense.
Heard from Senate staff friend the cloakroom buzz is Schiff is getting thru to GOP moderates, other managers not so much. And less Nadler the better.Â
Worth noting every time Loose Lips Lindsey speaksÂ
Bolton could just publicly release whatever relevant info he has. Â if the gambit is to get him to testify under oath, it ainât going to happen, so just break the GOP, i say.
Â
Mitt Romney lost me with his votes, yesterday- heâs just another coward like the rest.
…this doesnât end with conviction and/or removal, so manage expectations and goals accordingly.
lindseygraham richly deserves the destruction he calls down upon trump supporters. They all do.Â
Message from our Australian contingent Bill Woerlee
First two weeks of choking smoke, then the hailstorm which damaged heaps of cars, coronavirus from Wuhan, and now the dust storm. We’ll let your people go, whoever they ar, so long as we don’t get the other six plagues.Â
FOX not showing trial, instead Tucker says: “To the mouth breathers on cable television an Adam Schiff speech is like a brainstem massage. Surging waves of ecstasy flood the central nervous system, linear thought ceases. All that’s left are satisfied grunts of pleasure.”
Poor Ozzie.Â
It’s 32F and snowing here in MN. The worst thing happening in MN is happening in D.C.Â
I think tucker was actually thinking of his prostate massage.Â
Poobah, although I donât have the luxury of watching this stuff from gavel to gavel, your cloakroom buddy sees the same thing I see. I respect Nadler but give me Schiff, Lofgren and Jeffries and Iâll call it a day.Â
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/chief-justice-roberts-admonishes-both-sides-at-senate-impeachment-trial-after-marathon-session-erupts-into-shouting-match/ar-BBZctBg?ocid=spartanntp
Arendt found Eichmann an ordinary, rather bland, bureaucrat, who in her words, was âneither perverted nor sadisticâ, but âterrifyingly normalâ. He acted without any motive other than to diligently advance his career in the Nazi bureaucracy. Eichmann was not an amoral monster, she concluded in her study of the case, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (1963). Instead, he performed evil deeds without evil intentions, a fact connected to his âthoughtlessnessâ, a disengagement from the reality of his evil acts. Eichmann ânever realised what he was doingâ due to an âinability⌠to think from the standpoint of somebody elseâ. Lacking this particular cognitive ability, he âcommit[ted] crimes under circumstances that made it well-nigh impossible for him to know or to feel that he [was] doing wrongâ.Â
Arendt dubbed these collective characteristics of Eichmann âthe banality of evilâ: he was not inherently evil, but merely shallow and clueless, a âjoinerâ, in the words of one contemporary interpreter of Arendtâs thesis: he was a man who drifted into the Nazi Party, in search of purpose and direction, not out of deep ideological belief. In Arendtâs telling, Eichmann reminds us of the protagonist in Albert Camusâs novel The Stranger (1942), who randomly and casually kills a man, but then afterwards feels no remorse. There was no particular intention or obvious evil motive: the deed just âhappenedâ.
Joey Kato
 @mixcloudjkato36
What Did Hannah Arendt Really Mean by the Banality of Evil? – Aeon – Pocket

get-pocket.com
the brouhaha described in wapo’s version of
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/chief-justice-roberts-admonishes-impeachment-lawyers-telling-them-to-remember-where-they-are/2020/01/22/4e5758c0-3cdc-11ea-b90d-5652806c3b3a_story.html
Phrase of the Day:
The Banality of Evil
Nadler: Â You oughta be ashamed of your deception and cover-up of the Prezâs wrongdoings.
Republican Ass-Hat: Â You’re not the boss of me. Â Who died and made you king?
CJ John Bob: Â Forty lashes with a wet noodle. Â Letâs remember where we are and play nicely with each other. Â We donât ever talk like that here.
This is just ludicrous. Â Craig, Thereâs a book or a sitcom a la âCarter Countryâ somewhere in yesterdayâs mess.
SFB calls climate changers pessimists (or tries to say it), and Greta directly responds to him when she gives her speech âDonât be pessimists, they say.â SFB just couldnât let Greta have the last word at Davos.  Another presser before takeoff.  Jeez.  Also, did you hear him attempt to pronounce the word pessimist?  What is wrong with him?  Medically, I mean.  Â
darn I conked out around 11pm, missed the fireworks
Randy Rainbow is at it again with “Gaston” from Beauty and the Beast
Sounds like Nadler is being his usual idiotic self. Screwed the day up, everything had been going so good.
Jack
I watched some of it… Â but I’m not a late nighter. Â
Won’t watch much today. Â Going to the art museum in Manchester. Â There’s a special exhibit of shaker furniture and they have a couple of Edward Hopper paintings on loan. Â They leave on Sunday. Â Â
Still letting my eyes recover from the very late night. Â
Drat drat and more drats.
“naughty boy” Monty Python star, Terry Jones, dies at 77.
OK, I don’t think Bolton will be the hero of the impeachment trial. He’s got competing interests – whatever future he’d have as a repug power player versus a desire to sell his book. That said, here’s what SFB had to say about Bolton testifying:
Yeah, right, he’d like Bolton to testify. Just like he’d like to testify himself. Ain’t gonna happen.
Jack, perhaps Nadler went over the top but he didn’t say anything I don’t agree with.Â
trump quote atÂ
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-brags-about-concealing-impeachment-evidence-e2-80-98we-have-all-the-material-they-don-e2-80-99t-e2-80-99/ar-BBZdJo0
âSo, weâre doing very well. I got to watch [the impeachment trial] enough. I thought our team did a very good job. But honestly, we have all the material. They donât have the material.â
“we have all the material. They donât have the material”Â
hmmm, isn’t this what article 2 of impeachment is about?
https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/22/politics/trump-us-service-members-traumatic-brain-injuries/index.html
Bone Spurs âheard they had headaches.â Â And you, Donny, are a disrespectful, pain in the nationâs behind. Â
Just another crazy thing to say in order to distract from his trial? Â Would he say something so awful on any other day?
from rollingstone article about IMpotus brag above:
Hey- Nadler got admonished for quoting my 5pm-ish post from yesterday.
Hi, Mr. Nadler! Â
Thank you for calling out the GOP Senators who voted literally 582 times to keep all of us in the dark.
582 times!
The Senate may acquit, but Schiff is holding this trial in the Court of Public Opinion, and is crushing the Republicans.
Thank you, Rep. Schiff!
Schiff is doing a wonderful job right now.
Ping! I missed you the other day. Hope you’re enjoying today’s presentation. Seems as if Cong. Schiff is having ‘fair winds and following seas’.
Not nonfeasance nor misfeasance, but malfeasance! Go for Goiter-Man, too!!
Ooh, nice, Schiff used your Franklin quote as his conclusion, CC, nice job.
Watched all of Schiff’s epic 2 1/2 hour tour de force. Stunning. Even if it doesn’t matter to lock step cover-up Republicans.Â
Can someone plz let me know when Republicans finish with their opening obfuscation? Â i need a break and thatâs the best time for one.
Bink – I think you’ll get your break Monday. 582 times? Got a cite for that? I’d love to pass it along.
Bink, GOP thugs don’t get to speak for 3 days, except on FOX.Â
Ah, ok, thanks CC.
Â
Pogo-
11 amendments, 53 Rethuglican Senators voted to table them all 11 times, except Susan Collins on the least controversial 10th amendment (regarding scheduling), ergo:
Â
10 x 53 = 530
530 (plus) 52 = 582
You can cite me.
i donât love misnomers, but i may pepper my comments with âRethuglicanâ. Â Thanks again, CC!
Anyone catch what that person was yelling about?
Dems could have rested their case after Schiff’s powerful presentation. Lost the narrative with later speakers, disjointed and confusing.
Bink. Sounded like “Schumer is the devil.”Â
plus something about “Jesus Christ”
lol, ty Sir
I fear law of diminishing returns if Dems keep repeating themselves.Â
i liked Hakim Jeffriesâ presentation.., thereâs always Netflix if people get bored.
Bloombergâs new ad tonight: Â If Senate Republicans wonât remove Trump from office, this November, we will. Â
Best thing Dems can do now is pile on the videos and tweets showing Trump incriminating himself.Â
Lindsey Graham flat out said theyâll do whatever they need âto protect Trump.â What about  protecting our democracy, Lindsey?  Â
…funny how blatantly lying to the American people from the âWorldâs Most Distinguished Deliberative Bodyâ is acceptable to Chief Justice Roberts, but calling the liars out from it isnât acceptable. Â Makes zero sense.
Heard from Senate staff friend the cloakroom buzz is Schiff is getting thru to GOP moderates, other managers not so much. And less Nadler the better.Â
Worth noting every time Loose Lips Lindsey speaksÂ
Bolton could just publicly release whatever relevant info he has. Â if the gambit is to get him to testify under oath, it ainât going to happen, so just break the GOP, i say.
Â
Mitt Romney lost me with his votes, yesterday- heâs just another coward like the rest.
…this doesnât end with conviction and/or removal, so manage expectations and goals accordingly.
lindseygraham richly deserves the destruction he calls down upon trump supporters. They all do.Â
Message from our Australian contingent Bill Woerlee
FOX not showing trial, instead Tucker says: “To the mouth breathers on cable television an Adam Schiff speech is like a brainstem massage. Surging waves of ecstasy flood the central nervous system, linear thought ceases. All that’s left are satisfied grunts of pleasure.”
Poor Ozzie.Â
It’s 32F and snowing here in MN. The worst thing happening in MN is happening in D.C.Â
I think tucker was actually thinking of his prostate massage.Â
Poobah, although I donât have the luxury of watching this stuff from gavel to gavel, your cloakroom buddy sees the same thing I see. I respect Nadler but give me Schiff, Lofgren and Jeffries and Iâll call it a day.Â