Jack Smith, On the Record

☀️Three Takeaways from Jack Smith’s Testimony

The transcript dropped, the dust rose, and three truths stood standing.

1️⃣ This wasn’t politics — it was prosecution.
Jack Smith was unflinching: the Trump cases were built on evidence, not party labels. No White House nudging, no political strings. Just files, facts, and a prosecutor saying, I’d do this again.

2️⃣ January 6 doesn’t happen without Trump.
Smith made it plain: Trump wasn’t a background character. He was the engine. The testimony reinforces what many suspected — Trump knew he lost, said otherwise, and lit the fuse anyway.

3️⃣ Process mattered — maybe more than drama.
From lawful metadata collection to careful witness evaluation, Smith emphasized restraint over spectacle. This was methodical justice, not cable-news improv.

📺 Join us live at 11:00 a.m. ET for “ELEVEN TO NOON” our daily political diner where the coffee’s hot, the conversation’s real, and the comment section does half the cooking.

👉 Watch and chat live on YouTube (On cam, mic or keyboard)

Pull up a stool. The griddle’s already warm.

Share

56 thoughts on “Jack Smith, On the Record”

  1. from parody project 2 years ago but somewhat still relevant


    Feb 19, 2023
    If you’ve been waiting for something to happen with all of these investigations into wrong doings on the part of 45, you might enjoy this fantasy parody about Jack Smith and what he could and should do.

  2. Cundle tries his best Smith-wise


    “RUN RUN DONNY” CHECK-IN TIME 🎄🚨
    Did Donny actually outrun the truth here… or did Jack Smith catch him in verse two? Drop your verdict: TEAM DONNY RUNS or TEAM JACK CATCHES – and tell which lyric hit you hardest.

  3. Already getting the predictable comments on YouTube and TikTok blaming Democrats for resurrecting this to hurt the Current Officeholder. Similar to how the GOP drive demand for the Epstein files, it is REPUBLICANS who subpoenaed Jack Smith to give this testimony. And it’s DONALD TRUMP who called for an FBI investigation of him, wants him prosecuted. He wouldn’t be in the news at all if not for them.

    My big question is why did the House Judiciary Committee release Smith’s testimony? It’s not because they they thought it helps Trump, or they wouldn’t have dumped it out at the end of the day on New Year’s Eve.

  4. why did the House Judiciary Committee release Smith’s testimony?

    craig, wasn’t a public release of the testimony required in order to get him to agree to the closed hearing?

    could be his lawyer also required a set time deadline to be within so many days and they picked the most obviously helpful time to dump it.

  5. you might have the answer there, PatD. but i’m not sure he would have had the leverage to dictate conditions. i don’t know whether or not he was actually subpoenaed.

  6. A new Trail Mix Brief: Did Trump Start The Riot?

    Five years after January 6, a powerful narrative has taken hold: that because the federal cases against Donald Trump were dismissed, he was “proven innocent” of inciting the violence. This Brief dismantles that myth by comparing the procedural dismissals against the only judicial finding of fact that actually weighed the evidence in a courtroom—the Colorado ruling that he engaged in insurrection.

    LIVE TOPIC: We are breaking this down today in our Digital Diner. Join the “ELEVEN TO NOON” livestream on YouTube (11am ET) to debate the findings.

    Read the full Brief here:

    Did Trump Start the Riot? The Facts vs. The Peacekeeper Myth

  7. Patd, like I tried to say, I don’t hate kale. It wasn’t along the greens I grew up eating- mostly spinach, turnip and mustard greens – and just prefer those to kale. I’d eat it if someone cooked and served it, but given my druthers I would choose one of the ones my mom and grandmothers raised me on. Cook it until its tender in grease with enough salt, some sugar and splash vinegar or if you prefer, hot sauce, on it and I’m sure it would be fine.

    Oh, and Smith was subpoenaed by the House Judiciary Committee to testify behind closed doors AFTER he had agreed to testify in open proceedings, and he tried to get the committee to make the deposition public but Gym Jordan refused that request.

  8. Poobah, neither do I. Far be it for me to figure out what the hell might go on side of that idiot‘s head, but my guess is he did that to avoid having to defend against charges of selective editing if he just leaked pieces of it.

    And he was probably told that if he didn’t release it that all the political shows would have Smith on to tell his story and what he found in his investigation to rebut selectively released pieces of the testimony. Of course I’m just guessing.

  9. excerpt from a 12/24/25 report https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5662279-jack-smith-deposition-video-public/ hints to pressure from within and maybe a quid pro quo swap of some sort:

    Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) advocated for the release in a post Wednesday on social platform X.

    “I was there. There is no reason not to release the video and transcript,” he said in reply to a CBS News reporter’s post about the letter. “If @Jim_Jordan refused Jack Smith’s request for a public hearing — like every other Special Counsel — because he allegedly wanted to avoid the 5-minute rule, he got that.”

    Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) told The Hill on the day of Smith’s testimony that he wouldn’t oppose public testimony.

    “I do think that we’re dealing with unprecedented events here, so it’s entirely appropriate. And I think people on both sides, maybe for different reasons, think that what happened here bears scrutiny,” Kiley said.

    Jordan said last week he had not ruled out public testimony.

  10. Pog, Pat — what about the possibility Current Occupant wanted it done because he’s stupid and thought Smith would look bad. Jordan, who might be less stupid, obeyed orders but tried to bury it on new year’s eve. Current Occupant is the dumbass who managed to turn Epstein into a daily story.

  11. Donald Trump’s Golden Age of Awful
    A damage assessment of the President’s first year back in the White House.
    By Susan B. Glasser
    December 30, 2025

    No matter how low one’s expectations were for 2025, the most striking thing about the year when Donald Trump became President again is how much worse it turned out to be.

    Did we anticipate that Trump would come back to office wanting to rule as a king, consumed by revenge and retribution, and encouraged by sycophants and yes-men who would insure that he faced few of the constraints that hampered him in his first term? Yes, but now we know that bracing for the worst did not make the inevitable any less painful. In the future, historians will struggle to describe that feeling, particular to this Trump era, of being prepared for the bad, crazy, and disruptive things that he would do, and yet also totally, utterly shocked by them.
    A partial catalogue of the horrors of 2025 that not even the most prescient Trump-watcher could claim to have fully predicted: gutting cancer research in the name of expurgating diversity programs from the nation’s universities. Shutting the door to refugees—except for white Afrikaners, from South Africa. Empowering the world’s richest man to cut off funding for the world’s poorest children. Welcoming Vladimir Putin on a red carpet at an American Air Force base. Razing the East Wing of the White House, without warning, on an October morning. Alienating pretty much the entirety of Canada.

    Your list might be different from mine. There is so much from which to choose. And that is the point.

    Yet the biggest disappointment of 2025 may well have been not what Trump did but how so many let it happen. Trump has always been a mirror for other people’s souls, an X-ray revealing America’s dysfunction. If this was a test, there were more failing grades than we could have imagined.

    On the first day of his second term, the President pardoned more than fifteen hundred violent rioters who sacked their own U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, in a vain effort to overturn Trump’s 2020 election defeat. Even his Vice-President, J. D. Vance, had said that this was something that “obviously” shouldn’t happen; Trump’s chief of staff, Susie Wiles, later admitted that she had lobbied him not to go that far. But Trump didn’t listen. He was putting America on notice. The first outrage was a sneak preview of those to come: if there was a choice to be made, he would invariably opt for the most shocking, destructive, or corrupt option. And who was going to stop him?

    This is why any obituary for 2025 requires a special shout-out to those whose craven folding to Trump might well have proved to be among the biggest bad surprises of the year—the law-firm managing partners and corporate executives and technology tycoons who decided to pay protection money to the President rather than stand up for the rule of law that enabled their great success in the first place. Eight long years ago, the story of the first year of Trump’s first term was the rearguard struggle over control of the Republican Party; this time, with Trump having long ago won the battle for the G.O.P., he has extended his hostile takeover far beyond the realm of partisan politics, advancing a vision of breathtaking personal power in which the President claims the right to determine everything from what appears on the nightly news to the place names on our maps to which laws passed by Congress should be followed and which can be ignored.
    Just a year ago, it was still possible to envision a different course for Trump’s second term—to imagine that, while the President himself might really mean to carry through with his most radical plans, there remained strong forces in society to resist him. Republican leaders in Congress and the Trump-appointed conservative majority on the Supreme Court may yet prove to be something other than the willing handmaidens of democracy’s demise, but they have so far failed to do so. This past year’s disruptions are as much their work as Trump’s; without their acquiescence, as passive or unwilling as it has been at times, many of Trump’s most extreme acts would not have been possible. Just think about Senator Bill Cassidy, of Louisiana, a medical doctor who made much of the “assurances” he extracted from Trump’s vaccine-denying nominee for Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Kennedy won his confirmation vote, then broke the pledges he had made to get it. Cassidy has, in the tradition of the Senate, been deeply concerned ever since.

    2025 in Review
    New Yorker writers reflect on the year’s highs and lows.

    A partial catalogue of the horrors of 2025 that not even the most prescient Trump-watcher could claim to have fully predicted: gutting cancer research in the name of expurgating diversity programs from the nation’s universities. Shutting the door to refugees—except for white Afrikaners, from South Africa. Empowering the world’s richest man to cut off funding for the world’s poorest children. Welcoming Vladimir Putin on a red carpet at an American Air Force base. Razing the East Wing of the White House, without warning, on an October morning. Alienating pretty much the entirety of Canada.

  12. Here’s a pretty humorous MSN take on the issue.

    Allison Gilll, who co-hosted a podcast named “Jack” about the special counsel, noted that she understands now why Jordan wanted to bury the interview.

    “Half way through the Jack Smith transcript and it’s become abundantly clear why Jim Jordan didn’t want public testimony. Jordan spends a lot of time whining about the toll subpoenas, and Jack Smith shuts him down every time,” Gill wrote on BlueSky.

    In the morning podcast, Gill and co-host Dana Goldberg cited an exchange between Jordan and Smith where the former probed him on specific actions he took.

    “The whole time Jim Jordan had the microphone, which was a long time,” Gill began, “he winged about the toll record thing where the members of Congress against the ‘Speech or Debate Clause’ got their phone records subpoenaed by Jack Smith, and it should be against the law. And every time Jack Smith was like, yeah, that’s cool, bro, but it’s not against the law, and the courts agreed. So, we did it. And if you have a problem, guess what? You make laws.”

    “You fix the f—— law!” Goldberg added withe a chuckle.

    Gill also pointed out a key point in the Smith probe about Rudy Giuliani, who Smith’s team asked whether he believed his 2020 election lies. Giuliani confessed he didn’t “and that neither did Donald Trump.”

    “The President of the United States is a criminal. Thank you for your service, Jack Smith,” echoed Trump foe George Conway on BlueSky.

    NBC News’ justice reporter Ryan Reilly highlighted Jack Smith saying that he wouldn’t be surprised if Trump told the DOJ to indict him.

    MeidasTouch legal commentator Katie Phang detailed the questions about Smith’s proof that Trump was the instigator of the Jan. 6 Capitol attack.

    “The first is the evidence here made clear that President Trump was by a large measure the most culpable and most responsible person in this conspiracy,” Phang explained. “These crimes were committed for his benefit. The attack happened at the Capitol, part of this case does not happen without him. The other co-conspirators were doing this for his benefit. So, in terms of why we would pressure a case against him, I entirely disagree with any characterization that our work was in any way meant to hamper him in the Presidential election.”

    Smith went on to confirm that the evidence they gathered showed Trump prompted the Jan. 6 attack.

    “As I said, our evidence is that he in the weeks leading up to January 6th created a level of distrust,” Smith said. “He used that level of distrust to get people to believe fraud claims that weren’t true. He made false statements to state legislatures, to his supporters in all sorts of contexts and was aware in the days leading up to January 6th that his supporters were angry when he invited them and then he directed them to the Capitol. Now, once they were at the Capitol and once the attacks on the Capitol happened, he refused to stop it. He instead issued a tweet that without question in my mind endangered the life of his own vice president. And when the violence was going on, he had to be pushed repeatedly by his staff members to do anything to quell it. And then, even afterwards, he directed co-conspirators to make calls to Members of Congress, people who had — were his political allies, to further delay the proceedings.”

    Boom. But we knew that.

  13. One thing that has always caught my attention about January 6 is how all those people got to DC. These weren’t wealthy people for the most part, yet most traveled somehow across country and stayed in DC which isn’t cheap. So they were there and available to riot on command.

    Somebody paid those bills and as with every other event of the sort, you need to follow the money.

  14. Almost broke a thousand today, even though i forgot to turn my camera on for the first two minutes. We might have to take the partition out of our Holiday Inn ball room soon.

  15. Jamie, the goat sound is uploaded to our platform, ready to go — thanks. We now have sounds for the cows and goat, but not the jack ass. Also need a group sound for when they’re deliberating thorny editorial policy.

  16. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/exclusive-drugmakers-raise-us-prices-034741666.html

    Drugmakers plan to raise U.S. prices on at least 350 branded medications including vaccines against COVID, RSV and shingles and blockbuster cancer treatment Ibrance, even as the Trump administration pressures them for cuts, according to data provided exclusively ​by healthcare research firm 3 Axis Advisors.

    The number of price increases for 2026 is up from the same point last year, when drugmakers unveiled ‌plans for raises on more than 250 drugs. The median of this year’s price hikes is around 4% – in line with 2025.

    *Gas prices are down, though. That’s the equivalent of “rub some dirt on it & walk it off.”

  17. https://people.com/is-mtv-shutting-down-11878155

    MTV Music, MTV 80s, MTV 90s, Club MTV and MTV Live went off the air in various countries on Dec. 31. The United Kingdom, Ireland, France, Germany, Austria, Poland, Hungary, Australia and Brazil were impacted, according to the BBC.

    A chyron notes that fans can access MTV content on the main channel, MTV HD.

    Neither MTV nor its parent company, Paramount, has not commented on its reasoning for shutting down several of its channels dedicated to music programming, per Rolling Stone.

    *Fascists hate music that isn’t meant to promote loyalty to the regime.

  18. Five years after Jan. 6, we still don’t know the answer to the most basic question:

    Why didn’t he stop the violence—while it was happening?

    ▶️ WHY DIDN’T HE STOP IT?

  19. Why did he REFUSE to stop it?

    because it was achieving his goals of delaying the certification, of course

    we all watched him start it, Live on TV

  20. Snowin’ on Raton.
    By morning I’ll be thru them hills and gone.

    So many times.
    Denver, Cruces, Ruidoso, Clovis……

  21. RR – That’s the best meme of the year, but it’s only January 2nd.

    Why didn’t he try to stop it? He thought his violent army of helper monkeys would stop the certification of the election results. He thought he wouldn’t have to leave. Deranged, old POS. Anyone who is still carrying water for that orange bag of pus is a N&zi.

  22. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5670172-greene-trump-iran-protests/

    Greene said on the social platform X that Trump’s pledge, along with Israeli billionaire Shlomo Kramer telling CNBC that the federal government should “limit the First Amendment” by cracking down on speech on social media, is “everything we voted against” in 2024.

    “The focus should be on tax dollars here at home and defending our God given freedoms and rights,” added Greene, who is departing Congress on Monday after a falling out with Trump.

    Protests in Iran began over the weekend amid worsening economic conditions in the Middle Eastern country.

    The president vowed on Truth Social earlier Friday that the U.S. will “rescue” protesters if the Iranian regime takes violent action against them. He also said the U.S. is “locked and loaded and ready to go” if the Islamic Republic’s government kills more demonstrators.

    *Sounds like Orange Adolf thinks the failing economy in Iran is legit & not a hoax.

  23. https://nypost.com/2026/01/02/business/israeli-tech-billionaire-urges-americans-to-limit-the-first-amendment/

    Shlomo Kramer, the co-founder and CEO of cybersecurity firm Cato Networks, sparked outrage online after he urged Americans to “limit the First Amendment” — arguing that democratic nations must respond to emerging dangers by controlling online speech before it’s “too late.”

    He argued that unrestricted speech on social media platforms is fueling polarization and allowing hostile actors to undermine “the fabric of society and politics.”

    According to Kramer, governments and technology companies should take direct control of online platforms and determine who is allowed to speak — and how much influence their speech should carry.

    *Tax the billionaires out of existence. Eat them.

  24. ~Emerging dangers~ like realizing anti-Israel sentiment is not anti-semitism. Why is the US paying for healthcare for folks other countries, but not our own?

  25. if we couldn’t edify the electorate one blog post at a time in the past makes you think we’ll be able to going forward in a hyperdisinformative environment

    we lost, it’s over

    target audiences now include Z and younger whose brains were fried before they even developed

  26. 2nd most recent Pod Save closely aligning with recent discussions, they are doing a good job as always

  27. When the Most Digital Generation Goes Analog, Brands Need Research

    A Mental Health-Driven Move to Retro

    The analog revival isn’t just a passing TikTok trend and retro “dumb” phones. It’s a coping mechanism for mental overload, a rebellion against algorithmic manipulation, and a reassertion of agency over attention.

    And while Gen Z is now in the spotlight as workers and consumers, this shift also applies to rising Gen Alpha – those born between 2010 and 2024.

    In fact, data released in July 2025 by audience research company GWI showed the percentage of 12-to-15-year-old Gen A-ers who take breaks from smartphones, computers, and iPads has risen by 18% to 40% since 2022. A survey of 20,000 young people and their parents across 18 countries found that 40% of these young teens now take deliberate breaks from smartphones and social media, an 18% increase since 2022.

    Digital fatigue is real. Nearly half of Gen Z reports feeling overwhelmed by screens. Over 44% intentionally reduced screen time in the past six months. Ofcom reports that 47% of 16-to-24-year-olds now silence notifications or enable Do Not Disturb to regain focus.

    *The rest of the article is about figuring out marketing in a less digital world.

    Starving the social media platforms would be beautiful. January 11th is a place to start if you are so inclined. See if you can stay off of the internet, on-device games, or other non-analog distractions for 24 hours.

  28. Ok all the holiday lights are down, new year new me, let’s gooooo

    did not die on ladder 😎

    I didn’t withhold Christmas from the Trumpers, but I’m not giving them bonus Christmas 😡

    CERTAINLY not Russian Christmas

    Slava Ukraine, glory to the heroes

  29. Marking the 5th Anniversary of the Capitol attack. We dig into the data behind the noise—breaking down the transcripts, the timeline, and the rhetoric that shaped the day. Includes our latest analysis on the “Peacefully vs. Fight” count.

  30. Civil Discourse with Joyce Vance
    The Chief Justice’s Report on the State of the Judiciary

    I’m sympathetic to the position the Chief Justice is in. It’s not his job to play politics, and restraint is usually the general order of business. But the past year has not been a normal one. The Chief Justice’s year-end report treats it as though it has been.

    The past decade has made it clear that our institutions are only as strong as the people in them. That makes this photo a startling choice for a report about the judiciary, albeit likely unintentional. But it’s a marker for what has become increasingly clear: that the majority on this Court has failed to show up in a moment when their institutional voice is desperately needed. The Court has been either unwilling or incapable of meeting the challenge to democracy that Donald Trump poses.

    The Court has important cases to decide over the next few months. The National Guard ruling over the holiday was a bright spot where the Court temporarily told Trump no. But there are a number of highly significant cases on presidential powers, immigration, gerrymandering and voting rights, and more, still to come this term.

    The Chief Justice’s report takes the form of an essay about American history, followed by statistics about the Court and its work. You can read the full report here.

    More at link

  31. https://www.irishstar.com/news/us-news/nasas-goddard-library-shuts-putting-36487173

    NASA’s Goddard library shuts putting historic hub for American space exploration at risk

    The vast library is one of the most historic hubs of American space exploration, with 100,000 volumes at risk of being discarded.

    It is unclear which books, scientific journals, and archival documents will be retained and which will be discarded. Many of these are not digitized and cannot be found elsewhere.

    Among the works housed in the library are documents from the early 20th century, through to the Soviet space race of the 1960s and 1970s, which will be reviewed over the next 60 days. While some of the research will be transferred to federal storage, a certain amount will need to be disposed of.

    *Alexandria burns

  32. Core statement on the Supreme Court from above article

    John Roberts leads a Court that includes two members who are credibly accused of accepting expensive vacations and other tributes from wealthy men with an interest in the outcome of cases that come before the Court they sit on. Instead of creating consequences and standing for the adoption of a binding ethics code, the Chief Justice has allowed those wounds to fester and the Court’s integrity to suffer. That Court is under attack by the President and his cronies. But again, he offers us the founding documents, inexplicably, the only thing of substance he has to offer in a year where the courts fell under political attacks. My October post, When They Bukele The Courts, is just one of many examples of the open hostility the courts faced. The Chief Justice’s end of year statement acts as though none of that happened.

    In March, Roberts spoke out, a rare moment, when judges were threatened with impeachment. He did it with his back to the wall, when a failure to speak up could have been seen as tantamount to agreement. But as I wrote at the time, it was premature to welcome him to the resistance.

  33. Blue
    *Alexandria Burns

    All libraries are endangered. It is why even though I have to use my kindle to read, I still buy hardcover books. The Book of Eli doesn’t feel that far away.

  34. https://www.newsletter.samuel-warde.com/p/trump-isnt-building-a-ballroom-hes

    Standing alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at a joint press conference, Trump offered a digression that most of the press corps likely dismissed as typical real estate bragging. He spoke of a “ballroom” currently under construction at the White House complex.

    “It’s bigger than I told you,” Trump asserted, his cadence slipping into the familiar rhythm of a salesman.

    “It’s, you know, after realizing we’re gonna do the inauguration in that building, it’s got all bulletproof glass, it’s got all drone, they call it drone-free roof. It’s drones, won’t touch it. It’s a big beautiful safe building.”

    To the untrained ear, this was merely another gaudy addition to the Trump portfolio. It sounded like a Mar-a-Lago North tacked onto the People’s House.

    But to Seth Abramson, the preeminent Trump biographer and forensic archivist of the administration’s darkest corners, the statement was a siren.

    A ballroom is designed for visibility and light. It is built for the social permeation of the elite and the public. A structure clad in “all bulletproof glass” with a “drone-free roof” is not a ballroom. It is a bunker.

    To understand the validity of the “Fortress Thesis,” one must first understand the unique vantage point of its author.

    Seth Abramson is not merely a pundit. He is a trained observer of the criminal mind. Long before he was a New York Times bestselling author of the “Proof” trilogy, Abramson was a criminal defense attorney and investigator of the highest caliber.

    A criminal investigator does not listen to what a witness says. They listen for the inconsistencies that betray a guilty mind. When Trump speaks of a “drone-free roof,” a layperson hears “security.”

    Abramson, the former investigator who has analyzed thousands of police reports, hears “evasion.” He hears a subject who knows they are being hunted.

    In the context of standard architectural security, glazing is typically reinforced against blast pressure to prevent shattering from a car bomb. It is rarely designed to stop direct small-arms fire unless the building is expected to be a combat position.

    You do not armor a building against sniper fire unless you expect the surrounding area to be hostile territory.

    Then there is the “drone-free roof.” This is Trump’s layman interpretation of a Counter-Unmanned Aircraft System integration.

    In 2025, the commercial drone has become a defining asymmetric weapon. To render a roof “drone-free,” the facility must be equipped with active denial systems like radio frequency jammers or kinetic interceptors.

    This suggests the administration views the National Mall not as a park but as a potential “kill zone.”

    Abramson’s reporting tracks the cost of the project through a suspicious escalation curve. The “ballroom” was supposed to cost just $200 million. Then it jumped to $300 million, then $400 million. Now, updates have stopped, but the reality is far more staggering.

    “You guys know it’s a $1 billion bunker being created in anticipation of martial law,” Abramson writes, “whose $50 million ‘ballroom’ annex is merely its open-air atrium, right?”

    This is a critical architectural insight. In bunker design, it is common to have a “sacrificial” above-ground structure that serves as an entrance to the hardened core. A $1 billion price tag is inexplicable for a reception hall.

    It is, however, entirely consistent with the construction of a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility intended for Continuity of Government operations. The budget hides the bunker inside the ballroom line item.

    The fixation on January 20, 2029, is the “smoking gun” of the analysis. On this date, Donald Trump’s second term expires. The 22nd Amendment prohibits a third term. Yet the former reality star specifically stated, “we’re gonna do the inauguration in that building.”

    Abramson deduces the terrifying logic behind this. Why move the inauguration indoors to a bulletproof bunker? It implies a deviation from the tradition of the outdoor Capitol ceremony.

    The administration likely anticipates that the transfer of power, or the refusal to transfer power, will trigger civil unrest on a scale that makes an outdoor ceremony impossible.

    If Trump attempts to retain power or install a hand-picked successor in a fraudulent election, the inauguration becomes a target for resistance.

    If the country is under Martial Law on Inauguration Day, the leader requires a secure location to administer the oath.

    The presence of Netanyahu at the press conference acts as a thematic reinforce for the thesis. Israel has normalized the “bunkerization” of its leadership due to perpetual security threats.

  35. He called dead soldiers suckers and losers to a Marine office who is father of a dead soldier.

    Seems like more people should be made aware of that.

Comments are closed.

Join the Trail Mix

Get an alert when Craig goes live, and the link when our Open Thread heats up.